Traditional vs. Modern Materials. An Ecological Review
Traditional vs. Modern Materials. An Ecological Review compares the embodied energy and carbon of earth (0.5-1.5 MJ/kg), stone (0.8-3.0 MJ/k...
Traditional vs. Modern Materials. An Ecological Review compares the embodied energy and carbon of earth (0.5-1.5 MJ/kg), stone (0.8-3.0 MJ/k...
The comparison of wood, steel or Concrete. A Comparison from a green perspective reveals embodied carbon differences of up to 10 times: CLT...
The environmental impact of Construction, what you need to know: the construction materials industry generates 11% of global CO2 emissions (...
The life cycle of materials and its importance in sustainable construction is quantified through LCA methodology (ISO 14040/EN 15978): cemen...
Passive systems for heating, cooling, lighting and ventilation in buildings exploit free energy sources (sun, wind, thermal mass, water) to...
Choosing sustainable materials for a construction project requires evaluating 6 quantifiable criteria: embodied carbon (EPD per EN 15804: di...
Passive systems reduce heating and cooling energy demand by 50% to 90% compared to conventional buildings, with construction premiums of 5%...
Sustainable architecture is built on quantifiable fundamental elements: thermal envelope, orientation, ventilation, water management, materi...
Passive systems can reduce building energy consumption by up to 90% compared to conventional construction. This article presents verified pr...
Spanish monuments integrate passive climate control systems that have been functioning for centuries without energy consumption. This articl...
Site-responsive design to harness natural conditions — sun, wind, water, vegetation, and topography — reduces building energy demand by 40-7...
Technologies and materials for enhancing natural daylighting include spectrally selective glazing (Tv/g ratio exceeding 1.5), translucent po...